Why the study?
Does the ultrasonic technique accurately measure subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to skinfold calipers and roentgenograms?
Does the ultrasonic technique accurately measure subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to skinfold calipers and roentgenograms?
The ultrasonic technique is a valid and reproducible method for measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue, showing high correlation with soft-tissue roentgenograms.
Ultrasonic assessment may support subcutaneous fat evaluation; leaves open comparative validation and clinical adoption versus skinfolds.
Subcutaneous adipose tissue measurements, at abdomen, suprailiac, subscapular, and mid-triceps sites, made with the ultrasonic and skinfold caliper techniques were compared using data from 20 women and 17 men from a pool of subjects of 22 women and 20 men. In addition, comparisons were made between ultrasonic, soft-tissue roentgenographic and skinfold caliper techniques at the suprailiac and mid-triceps sites on 6 women and 12 men. Repeat measurements with the ultrasonic technique produced correlation coefficients of 0-87 and above. Correlations between skinfold caliper and ultrasonic measurements were generally higher among women than men over each of the four sites. A highly significant relationship, r = 0-88, was observed between the ultrasonic measurements and soft-tissue roentgenograms over the mid-triceps site. The correlation between the fat-muscle interface measured on the roentgenogram and ultrasonic measurements at the suprailiac site was 0-78. Multiple echoes and interfaces were observed at the suprailiac site on some subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haymes et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: