Editorials15 May 1998Variation in the Delivery of Health Care: The Stakes Are HighDavid E. Wennberg, MD, MPHDavid E. Wennberg, MD, MPHMaine Medical Center; Portland, ME 04102-3175Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00012 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail A generation ago, the remarkable variation in the delivery of health care across populations was brought to light [1]. Since then, numerous articles have documented variations across small and large areas of the United States in surgical procedures, health system capacity (such as physicians per capita), use of pharmaceuticals in chronic conditions, and intensity of diagnostic testing [2-6]. The principal finding of these studies has not changed: For medical care, geography is destiny.However, one thing has changed. Although clinicians may have had difficulty in finding implications in these studies for their personal practices, variation can no longer be seen ...References1. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973; 182:1102-8. Google Scholar2. Schein OD, Steinberg EP, Javitt JC, Cassard SD, Tielsch JM, Steinwachs DM, et al. Variation in cataract surgery practice and clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1142-52. Google Scholar3. Goodman DC, Fisher ES, Bubolz TA, Mohr JE, Poage JF, Wennberg JE. Benchmarking the US physician workforce. An alternative to needs-based or demand-based planning. JAMA. 1996; 276:1811-7. Google Scholar4. Ellerbeck EF, Jencks SF, Radford MJ, Kresowik TF, Craig AS, Gold JA, et al. Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. A four-state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA. 1995; 273:1509-14. Google Scholar5. Wennberg DE, Kellett MA, Dickens JD, Malenka DJ, Keilson LM, Keller RB. The association between local diagnostic testing intensity and invasive cardiac procedures. JAMA. 1996; 275:1161-4. Google Scholar6. Carey TS, Garrett J. Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125:807-14. Google Scholar7. Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Daley J, Hughes JS, Mackiernan YD. Predicting who dies depends on how severity is measured: implications for evaluating patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123:763-70. Google Scholar8. Salem-Schatz S, Moore G, Rucker M, Pearson SD. The case for case-mix adjustment in practice profiling. When good apples look bad. JAMA. 1994; 272:871-4. Google Scholar9. Dartmouth Medical School. Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care in the United States. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing; 1998. Google Scholar10. Jencks SF, Wilensky GR. The health care quality improvement initiative. A new approach to quality assurance in Medicare. JAMA. 1992; 268:900-3. Google Scholar11. Bloor MJ, Venters GA, Samphier ML. Geographical variation in the incidence of operations on the tonsils and adenoids. An epidemiological and sociological investigation. Part I. J Laryngol Otol. 1978; 92:791-801. Google Scholar12. Wennberg DE, Dickens JD Jr, Biener L, Fowler FJ Jr, Soule DN, Keller RB. Do physicians do what they say? The inclination to test and its association with coronary angiography rates. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12:172-6. Google Scholar13. Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker DR. The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:913-7. Google Scholar14. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:246-52. Google Scholar15. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant Lector et viewor-Let the reader and viewer beware [Editorial]. JAMA. 1997; 277:1244-5. Google Scholar16. Keller RB, Soule DN, Wennberg JE, Hanley DF. Dealing with geographic variations in the use of hospitals. The experience of the Maine Medical Assessment Foundation Orthopaedic Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1990; 72:1286-93. Google Scholar17. Nease RF Jr, Kneeland T, O'Connor GT, Sumner W, Lumpkins C, Shaw L, et al. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. Implications for clinical practice guidelines. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. JAMA. 1995; 273:1185-90. Google Scholar18. Morgan MW, Debar RB, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, et al. A randomized trial of the ischemic heart disease shared decision making program: an evaluation of a decision aid [Abstract]. J Gen Intern Med. 1996; 12:62. Google Scholar19. Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996; 275:152-6. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Maine Medical Center; Portland, ME 04102-3175Corresponding Author: David E. Wennberg, MD, MPH, Director, Division of Health Services Research, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102-3175. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byNurses' Perspectives on Family Caregiver Medication Management Support and DeprescribingQuality of Diabetes Care Among Recent Immigrants to the USAPhysician Preferences and Variations in Prescription of Biologic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Register-Based Study of 4,010 Patients in SwedenGeographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional StatusFrom Tonsils to ScopesUnderstanding variations in pediatric asthma care processes in the emergency department using visual analyticsVariations and Practice in the Care of Patients With Rheumatoid ArthritisA review of geographic variation and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications in prescription drug use researchAssessing cardiovascular drug safety for clinical decision-makingImpact of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Test on Clinical PracticeGeographic Variation in HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Use in Dialysis PatientsMoving the Issue of Renal Dietitian Staffing ForwardFecal occult blood testing instructions and impact on patient adherenceAppropriate Use of Lumbar Imaging for Evaluation of Low Back PainEditorial CommentAnatomie des CMRR et proposition de fonctionnementShared component modelling as an alternative to assess geographical variations in medical practice: gender inequalities in hospital admissions for chronic diseasesDo differences in profiling criteria bias performance measurements? Economic profiling of medical clinics under the Korea National Health Insurance program: An observational study using claims dataEvidence-Based Medicine and Decision SupportGeographic Information Systems and Emergency Care PlanningMeasuring Quality of Care in Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Development of an Explicit Quality Indicator SetAccounting for Variation in Technical Quality and Patient SatisfactionIs there much variation in variation? Revisiting statistics of small area variation in health services researchQuality Measurement in Orthopaedics: The Purchasers' ViewWhat Would a Good Doctor Do? Reflections on the Ethics of MedicineFactors Associated With Surgeon Referral for Physical Therapy in Patients With Traumatic Lower-Extremity Injury: Results of a National Survey of Orthopedic Trauma SurgeonsClosing Death's Door: Action Steps to Facilitate Emergency Opioid Drug Overdose Reversal in the United StatesManagement of outcomes in the ambulatory surgery center: the role of standard work and evidence-based medicineAre Performance Measures Based on Automated Medical Records Valid for Physician/Practice Profiling of Asthma Care?Predictors of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection-Role of patient versus nonpatient factorsCost analysis of schizophrenia treatment with second- generation antipsychotic medications in north Carolina's Medicaid programImproving health care quality for racial/ethnic minorities: a systematic review of the best evidence regarding provider and organization interventionsPhysician Group Cultural Dimensions and Quality Performance IndicatorsInfection Control Practices in U.S. Burn UnitsPhysician referrals to physical therapists for the treatment of spine disordersManagement of Back and Neck Pain: Who Seeks Care From Physical Therapists?The Value of Electronic Health RecordsEvolution of Statewide EMS Drug Formularies andRegulationsPhysical Therapy Use by Community-Based Older PeopleAntibiotics on urethral catheter withdrawal: a hit and miss affairVariations in Diabetes Care and the Influence of Office SystemsRisk reduction in general practice: the impacts of technologyAppropriateness measurement: application to advice-giving in community pharmaciesPresident's page: geographic variations in delivery of cardiovascular care: an issue of great importance to cardiovascular specialistsPerformance Measurement Through Audit, Feedback, and Profiling as Tools for Improving Clinical CareThe Future Catches Up: A Medical School Curriculum in Health EconomicsThe dialysis outcomes quality initiative: History, impact, and prospectsCan Resident Physicians Be Profiled?Procedure-Specific Outcomes Assessment for EsophagogastroduodenoscopyETHICAL CHALLENGES IN THE MANAGED PRACTICE OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGYAn Overview of the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative ImplementationEstablishing an Interdisciplinary Oncology Team 15 May 1998Volume 128, Issue 10Page: 866-868KeywordsBehaviorCommunication in health careDecision makingHealth careHealth care providersHealth care qualityHealth insuranceMedicarePercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyPopulation statistics Issue Published: 15 May 1998 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1998 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David E. Wennberg (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: