ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTσ−π Energy Separation in Modern Electronic Theory for Ground States of Conjugated Systems†Karl Jug, Philippe C. Hiberty, and Sason ShaikView Author Information Theoretische Chemie, Universität Hannover, Am Kleinen Felde 30, 30167 Hannover, Germany, Laboratoire de Chimie Physique, Umr 8000 CNRS, Université de Paris Sud, Bât 490, 91405 Orsay, France, and Department of Organic Chemistry and the Lise-Meitner-Minerva Center for Computational Chemistry, Hebrew University, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 5, 1477–1500Publication Date (Web):April 24, 2001Publication History Received28 August 2000Published online24 April 2001Published inissue 1 May 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr990328ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr990328eresearch-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1509Altmetric-Citations107LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Aromatic compounds,Electrical energy,Energy,Hydrocarbons,Molecules Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jug et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: