Object-oriented code is considered to be inherently more reusable than functional decomposition code; however, object-oriented code can suffer from a program understanding standpoint since good object-oriented style seems to require a large number of small methods. Hence code for a particular task may be scattered widely. Thus good semantics based tools are necessary. This paper describes an approach to object-oriented code understanding that focuses largely on informal linguistic aspects of code, such as comments and identifiers.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Etzkorn et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: