Key result
Catheter retraction during convection-enhanced delivery increases dispersed volume and yields more even infusate distribution.
Why the study?
Convection-enhanced delivery for glioblastoma has not become a common clinical therapy due to an inability to deliver therapeutics across a sufficiently large tissue volume to saturate the target region.
Does controlled catheter movement during convection-enhanced delivery increase the volume dispersed of infusate in a brain tissue phantom?
Does controlled catheter movement during convection-enhanced delivery increase the volume dispersed of infusate in a brain tissue phantom?
Computational modeling demonstrates that retracting catheters during convection-enhanced delivery can optimize the volume of tissue saturated by therapeutics, potentially enhancing glioblastoma treatment.
May warrant further preclinical testing of catheter movement; leaves open translation to improved glioblastoma outcomes in patients.
Convection‐enhanced delivery (CED) is an investigational method for delivering therapeutics directly to the brain for the treatment of glioblastoma. However, it has not become a common clinical therapy due to an inability of CED treatments to deliver therapeutics in a large enough tissue volume to fully saturate the target region. We have recently shown that the combination of controlled catheter movement and constant pressure infusions can be used to significantly increase volume dispersed ( V d ) in an agarose gel brain tissue phantom. In the present study, we develop a computational model to predict V d achieved by various retraction rates with both constant pressure and constant flow rate infusions. An increase in V d is achieved with any movement rate, but increase in V d between successive movement rates drops off at rates above 0.3–0.35 mm/min. Finally, we found that infusions with retraction result in a more even distribution in concentration level compared to the stationary catheter, suggesting a potential increased ability for moving catheters to have a therapeutic impact regardless of the required therapeutic concentration level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2022) studied Glioblastoma (simulated via brain tissue phantom). Controlled catheter retraction with constant pressure or flow rate infusions vs. Stationary catheter was evaluated on Volume dispersed (Vd). Catheter retraction during convection-enhanced delivery increased the volume dispersed and resulted in a more even distribution of infusate concentration compared to a stationary catheter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: