Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, novel chiral interactions on 3(10)-helical peptides, of which the helicity is controlled by external chiral stimulus operating on the N-terminus, were proposed as a "noncovalent chiral domino effect (NCDE)" (Inai, Y.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11731. Inai, Y.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2466). The present study clarifies the mechanism for generating the NCDE. For this purpose, achiral nonapeptide (1), H-beta-Ala-(Delta(Z)Phe-Aib)(4)-OMe [Delta(Z)Phe = (Z)-didehydrophenylalanine, Aib = alpha-aminoisobutyric acid], was synthesized. Peptide 1 alone adopts a 3(10)-helical conformation in chloroform. On the basis of the induced CD signals of peptide 1 with chiral additives, chiral acid enabling the predominant formation of a one-handed helix was shown to need at least both carboxyl and urethane groups; that is, Boc-l-amino acid (Boc = tert-butoxycarbonyl) strongly induces a right-handed helix. NMR studies (NH resonance variations, low-temperature measurement, and NOESY) were performed for a CDCl(3) solution of peptide 1 and chiral additive, supporting the view that the N-terminal H-beta-Ala-Delta(Z)Phe-Aib, including the two free amide NH's, captures effectively a Boc-amino acid molecule through three-point interactions. The H-beta-Ala's amino group binds to the carboxyl group to form a salt bridge, while the Aib(3) NH is hydrogen-bonded to either oxygen of the carboxylate group. Subsequently, the free Delta(Z)Phe(2) NH forms a hydrogen bond to the urethane carbonyl oxygen. A semiempirical molecular orbital computation explicitly demonstrated that the dynamic looping complexation is energetically permitted and that the N-terminal segment of a right-handed 3(10)-helix binds more favorably to a Boc-l-amino acid than to the corresponding d-species. In conclusion, the N-terminal segment of a 3(10)-helix, ubiquitous in natural proteins and peptides, possesses the potency of chiral recognition in the backbone itself, furthermore enabling the conversion of the terminally acquired chiral sign and power into a dynamic control of the original helicity and helical stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inai et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: