Key result
Sepsis is strongly linked to long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes including MI and heart failure.
Why the study?
It remains unclear to what extent chronic cardiovascular dysfunction mediates post-discharge functional limitations in sepsis survivors, or how to screen and manage those at risk.
Systematic Review (n=28)
This scoping review highlights a significant literature gap regarding the mechanisms that mediate post-sepsis cardiovascular dysfunction and emphasizes the urgent need for prospective studies to screen and manage patients at risk of chronic cardiovascular disease following critical illness.
Sepsis survivors merit cardiovascular surveillance; leaves open mechanistic studies and prospective management trials.
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in a magnitude comparable to other major cardiovascular risk factors. Sepsis is one of the most common reasons for intensive care admission and survivors often have significant functional limitations following discharge. However, it is not clear to what extent chronic cardiovascular dysfunction might mediate these functional impairments, or how we might screen and manage these patients at risk of chronic cardiovascular disease. We conducted a scoping review to map existing evidence and identify research gaps relating to cardiovascular dysfunction following sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases using a concept, context, population (CoCoPop) framework. Studies examining cardiovascular outcomes or symptoms following an episode of sepsis in adults were included. Data were mapped based on the population assessed, cardiovascular outcomes examined, inclusion of objective measures of cardiac dysfunction such as biomarkers or cardiovascular imaging, or whether cardiovascular symptoms or patient-reported functional outcomes measures were recorded. RESULTS: We identified 11 210 articles of which 70 were eligible for full text review and 28 were included in final analysis. Across our dataset, a wide range of incident cardiovascular outcomes were reported in the literature including incidence of congestive heart failure (13/28), arrhythmia (6/28), myocardial infarction (24/28) or cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality (20/28). Only 39% (11/28) of articles reported objective measures of cardiovascular function and only one article related cardiovascular function to functional impairment via patient-reported outcome measures. CONCLUSION: There are significant gaps in our understanding of cardiac dysfunction following sepsis . While the research highlights the strong association of sepsis with a variety of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, further prospective work is required to understand the mechanisms that mediate this phenomenon and how we can best identify and manage patients at risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrity et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Sepsis (n=28). Sepsis was evaluated on Reported incident cardiovascular outcomes (including myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and mortality) and objective measures of cardiovascular function. A scoping review of 28 articles demonstrated that while sepsis is strongly associated with long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes like myocardial infarction and heart failure, significant gaps remain regarding underlying mechanisms and prospective management strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: