PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 29, 2006Scientific Studies of Reading154 citations

Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test Without Reading It: Why Comprehension Tests Should Not Include Passage-Independent Items

View Full Paper
JKJanice M. KeenanRBRebecca S. Betjemann

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We examined the validity of the comprehension component of the Gray Oral Reading Test (GORT; Wiederholt & Bryant, 1992, 2001) by assessing whether reading really is required to answer its questions. The extent to which GORT questions are passage independent was assessed by having participants answer them without reading the passages. Most questions had passageless accuracies above chance. Furthermore, the best predictor of how well a child given normal GORT administration answered a question was not how well the child read the passage but rather how well the question could be answered without reading. Analyses comparing passage-dependent and passage-independent items showed: (a) passage-independent items are not sensitive to reading disability, and (b) passage-independent items do not correlate with performance on other comprehension tests. We conclude that the GORT Comprehension Score lacks both content validity and concurrent validity and that the field of comprehension assessment needs to be more concerned about the passage independence of items.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keenan et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20a5422387d5d606f368f8https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Four types of examinations compared and evaluated.1931 · 21 citations
  2. 2Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement2012 · 1,577 citations
  3. 3Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues1994 · 598 citations
  4. 4Answering Reading Comprehension Items without Passages on the SAT1990 · 81 citations
  5. 5Objective Evaluation of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Test Items Designed to Measure Comprehension of Reading Passages1972 · 48 citations