The Asian crisis provides heterodox economists with the opportunity to investigate counterfactually whether the financial policies they have proposed would have averted the crisis. The paper argues that neoliberal financial integration (both a cause and effect of global financialization) introduces distinct risks to emerging economies-currency, flight, fragility, contagion, and sovereignty risks. The paper presents the financial policies endorsed by the heterodoxy-transactions taxes, trip wires-speed bumps, convertibility restrictions, the Chilean model, and a publicly managed mutual fund. The paper considers whether these policies mitigate risks, and whether they could have prevented the Asian crisis (and the transmission thereof). The paper concludes with policies to avert future crises in emerging economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilene Grabel (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: