This paper studies preemptive static-priority scheduling on multiprocessors. We consider two approaches: global pfair static-priority scheduling and partitioned traditional static priority scheduling. We prove that if presented algorithms are used and if less than 50% of the capacity is used then all deadlines are met. It is known that no static-priority multiprocessor scheduling algorithm can achieve a utilization bound greater than 50%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: