Building on work of Cai, Furer, and Immerman [18], we show two hardness results for the Graph Isomorphism problem. First, we show that there are pairs of nonisomorphic n-vertex graphs G and H such that any sum-of-squares (SOS) proof of nonisomorphism requires degree Ω(n). In other words, we show an O(n)-round integrality gap for the Lasserre SDP relaxation. In fact, we show this for pairs G and H which are not even (1--10-14)-isomorphic. (Here we say that two n-vertex, m-edge graphs G and H are α-isomorphic if there is a bijection between their vertices which preserves at least αm edges.) Our second result is that under the R3XOR Hypothesis [23] (and also any of a class of hypotheses which generalize the R3XOR Hypothesis), the robust Graph Isomorphism is hard. I.e. for every e > 0, there is no efficient algorithm which can distinguish graph pairs which are (1 -- e)-isomorphic from pairs which are not even (1 -- e0)-isomorphic for some universal constant e0. Along the way we prove a robust asymmetry result for random graphs and hypergraphs which may be of independent interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Donnell et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: