This article presents a new method to detect copying on a standardized multiple-choice exam. The method combines two statistical approaches in successive stages. The first stage uses Kullback-Leibler divergence to identify examinees, called subjects, who have demonstrated inconsistent performance during an exam. For each subject the second stage uses the K-Index to search for a possible source of the responses. Both stages apply a hypothesis test given a significance level. Monte Carlo methods are applied to approximate empirical distributions and then compute critical values providing a low Type I error rate and a good copying-detection rate. The results with both simulated and empirical data demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belov et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: