Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates EGFR prediction accuracy in breast cancer, suggesting a scalable computational method for diagnostics.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is a key oncogenic driver in breast cancer, making it an important therapeutic target. Conventional approaches for EGFR identification, including motif- and homology-based methods, often lack accuracy and sensitivity, while experimental assays such as immunohistochemistry are costly and variable. To address these limitations, we propose a novel deep learning-based predictor, ERCNN-EGFR, for the accurate identification of EGFR proteins directly from primary amino acid sequences. Protein features were extracted using composition distribution transition (CDT), amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition (AmpPseAAC), k-spaced conjoint triad descriptor (KSCTD), and ProtBERT-BFD embeddings. To reduce redundancy and enhance discriminative power, features were refined using XGBoost-Feature Forward Selection (XGBoost-FFS) approach. Multiple deep learning frameworks, including Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), and Ensemble Residual Convolutional Neural Network (ERCNN), were evaluated. Among them, ERCNN demonstrated Superior performance, achieving 93.48% accuracy, 94.53% sensitivity, 92.58% specificity, and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.816 after feature selection, and maintained robust performance on an independent test set (82.85% accuracy). Ablation analysis confirmed that dual residual building blocks and ProtBERT-BFD features were critical to the model's predictive strength. ERCNN-EGFR offers a scalable, cost-effective, and accurate computational approach for EGFR identification, with potential applications in breast cancer diagnostics, therapeutic target discovery, and personalized treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alghamdi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: