Key result
Use of SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, was associated with a reduced risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81-0.96).
Why the study?
To assess the association between the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of new-onset AF in routine clinical practice.
Does SGLT2 inhibitor use reduce the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients without a history of AF?
Cohort (n=136,956)
Yes
Does SGLT2 inhibitor use reduce the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients without a history of AF?
In routine clinical practice, SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a modestly reduced risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in routine clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used nationwide registers in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden from 2013 to 2018 in order to include patients without a history of AF who were newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor or an active comparator (glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP-1] receptor agonist). We performed a cohort study to assess new-onset AF in intention-to-treat analyses using Cox regression, adjusted for baseline covariates with propensity score weighting. RESULTS: We identified 79,343 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors (59.2% dapagliflozin, 40.0% empagliflozin, 0.8% canagliflozin, <0.1% ertugliflozin) and 57,613 new users of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Mean age of the study cohort was 61 years and 60% were men. The adjusted incidence rate of new-onset AF was 8.6 per 1,000 person-years for new users of SGLT2 inhibitors compared with 10.0 per 1,000 person-years for new users of GLP-1 receptor agonists. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.96), and the rate difference was 1.4 fewer events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 0.6-2.1). Using an as-treated exposure definition, the aHR for new-onset AF was 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-0.99). No statistically significant heterogeneity of the aHRs was observed between subgroups of patients with and without a history of heart failure or major cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study using nationwide data from three countries, use of SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, was associated with a modestly reduced risk of new-onset AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engström et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Patients newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist (n=136,956). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors vs. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists was evaluated on New-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.96). Use of SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, was associated with a reduced risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81-0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: