PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1972Journal of Clinical Investigation180 citationsOpen Access

Lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: in vivo and in vitro studies

ISIrwin SingerDRDonald RotenbergJPJules B. Puschett

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The physiological basis for the polyuria and polydipsia occurring in some manic-depressive patients treated with lithium salts was studied in vivo and in vitro. Three lithium-treated polyuric patients, in whom other causes of a concentrating defect were excluded, had abnormal urinary concentrating abilities after a standard water depreviation test. Two of these patients failed to respond to exogenous vasopressin (ADH) and one had a subnormal response. The abilities of these patients to excrete solute-free water (C(H2O)) was comparable to normal subjects during steady-state water diuresis, suggesting no gross abnormalities in sodium transport. However, each of these patients demonstrated abnormally low capacities to reabsorb solute-free water (T(C) (H2O)) under hydropenic conditions after administration of hypertonic saline and vasopressin. These in vivo findings demonstrate at least a nephrogenic basis for the diabetes insipidus syndrome manifested by these three patients. The defect in water transport was further characterized in toad urinary bladders in vitro. Short-circuit current (I) and water flow (W) were studied under basal, ADH-stimulated, and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (c-AMP)-stimulated conditions. Increasing mucosal Li(+) progressively inhibited basal I, and both I and W induced by ADH. Significant inhibition of basal and ADH-induced I was observed at mucosal Li(+) < 1.1 mEq/liter, and of ADH-induced W at mucosal Li(+) = 11 mEq/liter. On the other hand, at these lithium concentrations, neither c-AMP-stimulated W nor I was inhibited. Increasing serosal Li(+) produced significant inhibition of basal I only at Li(+) at least 50-fold greater than at the mucosal (urinary) surface. These in vitro studies confirm that mucosal lithium inhibits the action of ADH, but not c-AMP. Hence, lithium appears to be a significant inhibitor of ADH-stimulated water flow, probably acts from the urinary surface, and appears to exert its effect at a site biochemically proximal to c-AMP action.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Singer et al. (1972) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b10b9e00afa23b2344d2https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper