Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The duration time that an en route controller is actively engaged in ground-to-air communications has been investigated to determine if the duration is a valid measure of controller workload. Data was collected during a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Planned View Display Baseline Study conducted with Washington Air Route Traffic Control Center personnel. The correlation coefficient between the controllers' communication duration of the 4 min prior to a rating and the controllers' real-time subjective workload ratings was r = .88, p < .01, which validates communication duration as a workload measure. Automated monitoring of duration time would allow warning of controller stress on a real-time basis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas H. Porterfield (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: