Mortality has figured prominently in the field of population geography; death, conversely, has received minimal attention. This has important implications given that mortality directs attention primarily to populations whereas death focuses attention toward individual bodies. In this progress report, I situate the geographic study of mortality within ongoing theorizations of precarity and precariousness. Drawing on Marxist ideas of labor-capacity and social reproduction, I reflect also on the idea of ‘shared mortality’. This is followed by a discussion of ‘dead peasants’ insurance. In so doing I forge a bridge between population geography and the emergent sub-field of biofinancialization. I conclude with a distinction between ‘premature death’ and ‘truncated life’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James A. Tyner (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: