PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 15, 2019The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism20 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Perimenopausal Transdermal Estradiol and Micronized Progesterone on Markers of Risk for Arterial Disease

View Full Paper
JGJennifer L. GordonDRDavid R. RubinowLWLana L. Watkins

Key Result

Transdermal estradiol plus intermittent micronized progesterone prevented age-related decreases in flow-mediated dilation and increases in stress reactivity compared to placebo.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=172)

Blinding

Double-blind

Randomization

Randomized

Structured PICO

Does transdermal estradiol plus intermittent micronized progesterone improve markers of risk for arterial disease in healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women?

P
Population
172 healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women aged 45 to 60 years, randomized to hormone therapy or placebo for 12 months.
I
Intervention
Transdermal estradiol (0.1 mg/day) plus intermittent micronized progesterone (200 mg/day for 12 days) for 12 months
C
Comparator
Identical placebo patches and pills for 12 months
O
Outcome
Change in stress reactivity composite z-score, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, baroreflex sensitivity, and metabolic risk (presence of metabolic syndrome or insulin resistance) at 6 and 12 monthssurrogate

Transdermal estradiol plus intermittent micronized progesterone may prevent age-related declines in endothelial function and stress reactivity in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The arterial effects of hormone therapy remain controversial. This study tested the effects of transdermal estradiol plus intermittent micronized progesterone (TE + IMP) in healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women on several mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of arterial disease. METHODS: Healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women, ages 45 to 60 years, were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Women were randomized to receive TE (0.1 mg/day) + IMP (200 mg/day for 12 days) or identical placebo patches and pills for 12 months. Outcomes included: change in stress reactivity composite z-score (combining inflammatory, cortisol, and hemodynamic responses to a standardized psychological laboratory stressor); flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery (an index of vascular endothelial function); baroreflex sensitivity; and metabolic risk (presence of the metabolic syndrome or insulin resistance), all assessed at baseline and at months 6 and 12. RESULTS: Of 172 women enrolled, those assigned to TE + IMP tended to have higher resting baroreflex sensitivity than those assigned to placebo across the 6- and 12-month visits. Although treatment groups did not differ in terms of the other prespecified outcomes, a significant treatment-by-age interaction was found for FMD and stress reactivity such that an age-related decrease in FMD and increase in stress reactivity were seen among women assigned to placebo but not those assigned to TE + IMP. Women on TE + IMP also had lower resting diastolic blood pressure, lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and higher baroreflex sensitivity during stress testing. CONCLUSIONS: TE + IMP tended to improve cardiac autonomic control and prevented age-related changes in stress reactivity and endothelial function among healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gordon et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal (n=172). Transdermal estradiol plus intermittent micronized progesterone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in stress reactivity composite z-score, flow-mediated dilation, baroreflex sensitivity, and metabolic risk. Transdermal estradiol plus intermittent micronized progesterone prevented age-related decreases in flow-mediated dilation and increases in stress reactivity compared to placebo.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b1b3515be2b4c6f9e81fhttps://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper