Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To classify and evaluate patient-defined hand-arm treatment goals in young people with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing upper extremity surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient-defined hand-arm treatment goals were collected from young people with CP and upper extremity spasticity using a semi-structured Canadian Occupational Performance Measure interview. Goals were classified within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Inter-rater agreement of the classification was assessed. Frequencies of goals were analyzed, with subgroup analyses across Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants (62% male; mean age 16.3 years, SD 3.9) reported 107 goals. All but two goals were classified within the Activities and Participation domain with perfect inter-rater agreement (100%). Inter-rater agreement for ICF-CY third- and fourth-level categories was 79.9%. The most frequent categories were grasping (20.5%) and manipulating (11.0%). Patients with MACS-levels IV-V mainly reported goals related to self-care and pain. Patients with MACS-levels I-III focused on bimanual activities. CONCLUSION: Patient-defined hand-arm treatment goals were successfully classified to the Activities and Participation domain, with variation across manual ability levels. Classification into ICF-CY third- and fourth-level categories is anticipated to enhance the development of individualized treatment plans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ossenbruggen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: