Key result
Primary coronary angioplasty was compared to intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, but the provided abstract contains no clinical results.
Authors
Loading...
Abstract lacks clinical results; leaves open comparative efficacy of angioplasty versus thrombolysis in acute MI.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Weaver et al. (1998) studied this question. Primary coronary angioplasty was compared to intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, but the provided abstract contains no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: