Presents experimental results for two adaptive nonlinear controllers applied to a variable reluctance motor (VRM). The first controller requires both rotor position and velocity (full-state) feedback, while the latter is an observer-based backstepping-type output feedback controller, requiring only rotor position measurement. Velocity for the full-state controller is estimated using a high-gain "differentiating filter". The experimental comparison shows that the observer-based controller provides a better transient response, a smaller steady-state tracking error when gains for both controllers are comparable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milman et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: