Spiking neural networks are biologically plausible counterparts of the artificial neural networks. Conventional (non spiking) artificial neural networks are trained using a stochastic gradient descent algorithm (back propagation) while spiking neural networks are trained using the spike timing dependant plasticity algorithm. Training conventional neural networks is a memory and computationally/energy intensive job. Spiking networks show the potential to reduce both memory and energy usage. In this work, we consider spiking neural networks (SNN) as a classifier of the MNIST and NM-NIST digits. We compare SNNs with convolutional neural networks in terms of classification accuracy, catastrophic forgetting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaila et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: