In this article, the author first surveys the explanations given by leading writers for corporate success and then goes on to sketch a definition of what he calls “meta‐competence”: the corporate capacity for building and sustaining core competence. Delving below the popular explanations for Wal‐Mart’s success, he then uses Wal‐Mart to illustrate his argument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jules Goddard (1997) studied this question.