Key result
Based on 56 in-depth interviews and 3 focus groups, family-based structured lifestyle modification interventions were perceived as desirable and feasible, facilitated by regular monitoring.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe participants' and providers' perspectives of barriers and facilitators of enrolment, participation, and adherence to structured lifestyle modification interventions within the PROLIFIC trial in Kerala, India.
What are the perceived facilitators and barriers to enrolment, participation, and adherence to a family-based structured lifestyle modification intervention in Kerala, India?
What are the perceived facilitators and barriers to enrolment, participation, and adherence to a family-based structured lifestyle modification intervention in Kerala, India?
Family-based, trained healthcare worker-led structured lifestyle modification interventions are feasible and desirable in Kerala, with adherence facilitated by regular monitoring, family involvement, and home-based care.
May inform pilot design in similar settings; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
<ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Background:</ns4:bold> The objective of the study was to describe participants’ and providers’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators of enrolment, participation and adherence to a structured lifestyle modification (SLM) interventions as part of the PROLIFIC trial in Kerala, India. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods:</ns4:bold> Family members who had been enrolled for 12-months or more in a family-based cardiovascular risk reduction intervention study (PROLIFIC Trial) were purposively sampled and interviewed using a semi-structured guide. The non-physician health workers (NPHWs) delivering the intervention were also interviewed or included in focus groups (FGDs). Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results:</ns4:bold> In total, 56 in-depth interviews and three FGDs were conducted. The descriptive themes emerged were categorised as (a) motivation for enrolment and engagement in the SLM interventions, (b) facilitators of adherence, and (c) reasons for non-adherence. A prior knowledge of familial cardiovascular risk, preventive nature of the programme, and a reputed organisation conducting the intervention study were appealing to the participants. Simple suggestions of healthier alternatives based on existing dietary practices, involvement of the whole family, and the free annual blood tests amplified the adherence. Participants highlighted regular monitoring of risk factors and provision of home-based care by NPHWs as facilitators for adherence. Furthermore, external motivation by NPHWs in setting and tracking short terms goals were perceived as enablers of adherence. Nonetheless, home makers expressed difficulty in dealing with varied food choices of family members. Young adults in the programme noted that dietary changes were affected by eating out as they wanted to fit in with peers. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions:</ns4:bold> The findings suggest that a family-based, trained healthcare worker led SLM interventions are desirable and feasible in Kerala. Increasing the number of visits by NPHWs, regular monitoring and tracking of lifestyle goals, and targeting young adults and children for dietary changes may further improve adherence to SLM interventions. </ns4:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph et al. (2019) studied Cardiovascular risk. Family-based structured lifestyle modification (SLM) interventions was evaluated on Perceived facilitators and barriers of enrolment, participation and adherence. Based on 56 in-depth interviews and 3 focus groups, family-based structured lifestyle modification interventions were perceived as desirable and feasible, facilitated by regular monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: