There have been recent discussions about a paradigm shift to new forms of scholarship for tenure and promotion. An 18-item survey was sent to a select sample of teacher educators to gain insights about what they and their respective institutions are doing to develop technology-based projects. Four reasons selected most frequently for creating technology-based projects are: (a) instructional impact, (b) professional recognition, (c) opportunities for research, and (d) motivation for end user. Respondents indicated that time and monetary support, equipment, professional-development opportunities, and recognition are needed to encourage faculty involvement with technology-based projects. Respondents suggested the following four criteria to judge the value of technology-based projects for tenure and promotion: (a) contribution to the field, (b) national recognition of the project; (c) well-researched data collected prior to development, and (d) local recognition of project. Recommendations for increasing the value of technology-based projects in tenure and promotion decisions and for garnering institutional support and professional association assistance are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seminoff et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: