Despite their relatedness, Dutch and German differ in the interpretation of a particular intonation contour, the hat pattern. In the literature, this contour has been described as neutral forDutch, and as contrastive forGerman. A recent study supports the idea that Dutch listeners interpret this contour neutrally, compared to the contrastive interpretation of a lexically identical utterance realised with a double peak pattern. In particular, this study showed shorter lexical decision latencies to visual targets (e.g., PELIKAAN, ‘‘pelican’’) following a contrastively related prime (e.g., flamingo, ‘‘flamingo’’) only when the primes were embedded in sentences with a contrastive double peak contour, not in sentences with a neutral hat pattern. The present study replicates Experiment 1a of Braun and Tagliapietra (2009) withGerman learners ofDutch.Highly proficient learners ofDutch differed fromDutch natives in that they showed reliable priming effects for both intonation contours. Thus, the interpretation of intonationalmeaning in L2 appears to be fast, automatic, and driven by the associations learned in the native language.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braun et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: