Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relationship between integrative capacity and evaluations of leadership effectiveness was examined in a 9-month program for developing business leaders. Integrative capacity was conceptualized as a central dimension of the structural psychological characteristic, active coping, and differentiated from the cognitive construct, integrative complexity. Self-report, semiprojective, and projective measures of integrative capacity obtained at the beginning of the program were correlated with peer and faculty ratings of leadership at the end of the program. Significant correlations ranged from .27 (p < .05) to .52 (p < .001). Intelligence and integrative capacity contributed separately to leadership. The findings support the value of examining variables related to personality structure and the use of projective techniques to assess candidates for positions of business leadership.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratch et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: