In addition to Taft's dual substituent parameter (DSP) and DSP–non–linear resonance (DSP–NLR) models, and Charton's triple substituent parameter (TSP) equation, two second‐order regression models were tested using published data for 13 C substituent chemical shifts of the C‐4 atom in 1,4‐disubstituted benzenes. The complete data matrix consisted of 14 series with a fixed Y (C‐4) substituent, each with 14 variable X (C‐1) substituents. Second‐order (in the σ parameter or in a combination of the σ 1 and σ constants) models gave results as good as, and in some cases even better than, the DSP–NLR equation; the results of the TSP model were always worse. The whole data matrix was submitted to principal component analysis. Target testing has shown vectors of σ , (σ ) 2 and σ I constants as ‘real’ principal components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miroslav Holı́k (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: