In anoxic methanogenic sediments organic matter is degraded to CH4 and CO2 via intermediary metabolites. When CH4 production in slurries of littoral sediment was inhibited by chloroform, acetate accumulated with a rate (2.26 μM h−1) similar to the turnover rate (2.09 μM h−1) of [2−14C]acetate. Addition of chloroform resulted also in accumulation of propionate > 2-propanol > caproate > valerate > H2. Accumulation of H2 was small but sufficient to thermodynamically inhibit consumption of caproate and valerate by H+-reducing bacteria. Consumption stopped when the available Gibbs free energy had increased from about −16 to about −9 kJ mol−1 H2 produced. 2-Propanol increased probably mainly because of the accumulation of acetate with the available δG increasing from about −13 to −3 kJ mol−1 of 2-propanol consumed. Propionate accumulation, however, could not be explained by thermodynamic inhibition of propionate consumption since the Gibbs free energy of this reaction was generally very low (δG ≈ −3 kJ mol−1). Bacterial enrichment cultures on cellulose resulted in the production of similar metabolites as observed during the accumulation experiments. Assuming that propionat, 2-propanol, caproate and valerate were converted via acetate and H2 to CH4, their accumulation rates plus that of acetate accounted for 134% of the rate of CH4 production. Carbon flow through acetate accounted for 80–87% of the total carbon flow to CH4. This relatively high percentage may be due to the relative importance of either homoacetogenesis or of acetate-rich organic matter (e.g., chitin) in littoral sediment of Lake Constance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rothfuß et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: