Why the study?
Does atenolol improve outcomes and provide anti-ischaemic benefits in patients with ischaemic heart disease compared to calcium antagonists?
Does atenolol improve outcomes and provide anti-ischaemic benefits in patients with ischaemic heart disease compared to calcium antagonists?
This review highlights the broad efficacy of atenolol in managing ischaemic heart disease and its specific mortality benefit in acute myocardial infarction, contrasting it favorably against calcium antagonists.
May support atenolol over calcium antagonists in IHD; leaves open need for contemporary RCTs.
SummaryData generated to date on the use of beta-blockers, especially atenolol, in ischaemic heart disease are reviewed and compared with the results available with the calcium antagonists. Atenolol appears to be effective as an anti-ischaemic agent in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease when reduction in myocardial oxygen supply (ischaemia not preceded by an increase in heart rate and due presumably to functional coronary stenosis) or increase in demand are the likely causes. Based on current concepts and available data, there is convincing evidence to support the use of atenolol across the spectrum of ischaemic heart disease. In contrast, results with the calcium antagonists have been disappointing and variable. Atenolol, to date, is the only beta-blocker which has been demonstrated to have a life-saving benefit in acute intervention (within 12 hours of onset) in myocardial infarction. This cardioprotective aspect of the drug is likely to be applicable to other areas of ischaemic heart disease, including silent ischaemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruickshank et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: