T is said to be ergodic if T-1E=E, ECG3, implies either mE=O or m (X-E)=O. P. R. Halmos [1 ] has posed the problem of characterising spectrally the property of ergodicity for ar-finite infinite measure preserving transformations. Our purpose is to show that the ergodicity of such a transformation is not a spectral property. Let UT denote the induced unitary operator of L2(X,63,m) onto itself defined by
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Parry (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: