Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates different market outcomes in peer-to-peer electricity structures, suggesting improved consumer satisfaction.
With the sustained deployment of distributed generation capacities and the more proactive role of consumers, power systems and their operation are drifting away from a conventional top-down hierarchical structure. Electricity market structures, however, have not yet embraced that evolution. Respecting the high-dimensional, distributed and dynamic nature of modern power systems would translate to designing peer-to-peer markets or, at least, to using such an underlying decentralized structure to enable a bottom-up approach to future electricity markets. A peer-to-peer market structure based on a multi-bilateral economic dispatch (MBED) formulation is introduced, allowing for multi-bilateral trading with product differentiation, for instance based on consumer preferences. A relaxed consensus + innovation (RCI) approach is described to solve the MBED in fully decentralized manner. A set of realistic case studies and their analysis allow us to show that such peer-to-peer market structures can effectively yield market outcomes that are different from centralized market structures and optimal in terms of respecting consumers preferences while maximizing social welfare. Additionally, the RCI solving approach allows for a fully decentralized market clearing that converges with a negligible optimality gap, with a limited amount of information being shared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sorin et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: