This study examines if blockchain fundamentals determine cryptoasset prices. Previous research has shown that non-fundamental factors affect cryptoasset prices however, whether blockchain fundamentals affect cryptoasset prices, lacks empirical research. Using data for 652 cryptoassets, I specify active addresses-to-network value as a valuation metric that captures transaction benefits. I find anomalous returns that increase with active addresses-to-network value ratio, a proxy for the value anomaly. Cryptoassets with a high active addresses-to-network value ratio yield on average 3.7 percentage points higher weekly returns than cryptoassets with low active addresses-to-network value ratio, and comparable size. A four-factor model directed at capturing the value pattern in average returns performs better than the three-factor model. Importantly, my results suggest that cryptoasset prices are related to their blockchain fundamentals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca J. Liebi (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: