Key result
Abciximab-coated stents showed comparable inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration and neointimal hyperplasia to sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
Why the study?
Does an abciximab-coated stent reduce inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia compared to sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in a porcine coronary restenosis model?
Does an abciximab-coated stent reduce inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia compared to sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in a porcine coronary restenosis model?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.58% vs 1.69%
p-value: p=NS
Abciximab-coated stents demonstrated comparable inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration and neointimal hyperplasia to sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in a porcine restenosis model.
Should not yet influence stent choice; leaves open translation of abciximab-coated stents to human restenosis prevention.
The aim of this study was to examine the anti-inflammatory effect of abciximab-coated stent in a porcine coronary overstretch restenosis model. Ten abciximab-coated stents, ten sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), and ten paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) were deployed with oversizing (stent/artery ratio 1.3:1) in porcine coronary arteries, and histopathologic analysis was done at 28 days after stenting. There were no significant differences in the neointima area normalized to injury score and inflammation score among the three stent groups (1.58 +/- 0.43 mm(2), 1.57 +/-0.39 mm(2) in abciximab-coated stent group vs. 1.69 +/- 0.57 mm(2), 1.72 +/- 0.49 mm(2) in the SES group vs. 1.92 +/- 0.86 mm(2), 1.79 +/- 0.87 mm(2) in the PES group, respectively). In the neointima, most inflammatory cells were lymphohistiocytes. Significant positive correlations were found between the extent of inflammatory reaction and the neointima area (r=0.567, p<0.001) and percent area stenosis (r=0.587, p<0.001). Significant correlations were found between the injury score and neointimal area (r=0.645, p<0.001), between the injury score and the inflammation score (r=0.837, p<0.001), and between the inflammation score and neointimal area (r=0.536, p=0.001). There was no significant difference in the inflammatory cell counts normalized to injury score among the three stent groups (75.5 +/- 23.1/microL in abciximabcoated stent group vs. 78.8 +/- 33.2/microL in the SES group vs. 130.3 +/- 46.9/microL in the PES group). Abciximab-coated stent showed comparable inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration and neointimal hyperplasia with other drug-eluting stents in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2007) studied Coronary restenosis (porcine model) (n=15). Abciximab-coated stent vs. Sirolimus-eluting stent and Paclitaxel-eluting stent was evaluated on Neointima area normalized to injury score (p=NS). Abciximab-coated stents showed comparable inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration and neointimal hyperplasia to sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: