Key result
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review to assess the effectiveness of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; no results are available yet.
Why the study?
Does maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation improve healthcare utilisation, quality of life, and functional capacity in patients with COPD?
Systematic Review
Does maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation improve healthcare utilisation, quality of life, and functional capacity in patients with COPD?
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review to assess the effectiveness of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with COPD.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effectiveness of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with COPD, including: the overall efficacy of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation on healthcare utilisation, health‐related quality of life, exercise/functional capacity, self‐efficacy, psychological well‐being and objective measures of health outcome the comparative efficacy of different types of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation (e.g. mode of delivery, content such as physical training alone or in combination with psychosocial and educational support, and length of intervention) whether the duration of benefit is related to the magnitude of the initial improvement during primary pulmonary rehabilitation the comparative efficacy of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation in relation to COPD severity
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yorke et al. (2010) conducted a systematic review in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation was evaluated on Healthcare utilisation, health-related quality of life, exercise/functional capacity, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and objective measures of health outcome. This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review to assess the effectiveness of maintenance pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; no results are available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: