Key result
Atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from surface ECG lead V1 is not a risk marker for stroke in atrial fibrillation, with similar rates in stroke patients (369 fpm) and controls (378 fpm).
Why the study?
Is atrial fibrillatory rate from surface ECG lead V1 associated with the risk of embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Case-Control (n=158)
Is atrial fibrillatory rate from surface ECG lead V1 associated with the risk of embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from surface ECG lead V1 does not serve as a risk marker for embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Surface ECG V1 fibrillatory rate should not inform stroke risk stratification in AF; leaves open whether other ECG parameters predict embolism.
AIMS: In atrial fibrillation (AF), a relation between electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters such as fibrillatory wave amplitude and stroke has been sought with conflicting results. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the atrial fibrillatory rate of surface ECG lead V1 is related to stroke risk and may consequently be helpful for identifying high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial fibrillatory rate of 79 consecutive patients with AF and embolic stroke (age 83 +/- 7 years, 41% male) was compared with those of a matched AF population without stroke (n = 79). Atrial fibrillatory rate was determined from the surface ECG using spatiotemporal QRST cancellation and time-frequency analysis of lead V1. There was no significant difference in any clinical or echocardiographic variable in patients with stroke compared with AF controls without stroke. Atrial fibrillatory rate measured 373 +/- 55 fibrillations per minute (fpm; range 235-505 fpm) in the entire population. There was no fibrillatory rate difference between stroke patients (369 +/- 54 fpm, range 256-505 fpm) and AF controls without stroke (378 +/- 56 fpm, range 235-488 fpm). There was an inverse correlation between fibrillatory rate and age (R = -0.219, P = 0.006). Individuals aged >or=85 years had a significantly lower fibrillatory rate (356 +/- 44 fpm) than individuals aged 65-74 years (384 +/- 56 fpm, P = 0.033) and individuals aged 75-84 years (384 +/- 60 fpm, P = 0.016). In those subgroups, fibrillatory rates were, however, also similar in stroke patients and AF controls. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from surface ECG lead V1 is not a risk marker for stroke in AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bollmann et al. (2009) conducted a case-control in Atrial fibrillation (n=158). Atrial fibrillatory rate was evaluated on Atrial fibrillatory rate. Atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from surface ECG lead V1 is not a risk marker for stroke in atrial fibrillation, with similar rates in stroke patients (369 fpm) and controls (378 fpm).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: