Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rejoining other authors’ arguments in favor of less linear and more process-based studies of change in purpose-oriented networks (PONs), we propose conceiving of PONs not as social entities or forms, but as processes constantly in flux. From this perspective, PONs comprise more or less interconnected processes constantly at play, albeit with more or less intensity, depending on the reflexive management and actions of their participants. We contend that a process view sheds light on three major themes categorizing extant research on network development: network development as the product of engineered, planned managerial actions; network evolution as the product of unintended, systemic changes both within and outside of PONs; and the management of network tensions as the central object of managerial attention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berthod et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: