Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
, are particularly difficult to explain and cause controversial discussions. Also for indirectly genotoxic agents, an ineffective (threshold) dose must be assumed. The situation is aggravated by the use of doubtful epidemiological studies in humans such as in the case of glyphosate, where data from mixed exposure to various chemicals were used. If such considerations are mixed with pure hazard classifications such as 'probably carcinogenic in humans' ignoring dose-response behavior and mode-of-action, the misinformation and public confusion are complete. It appears more urgent but also more difficult than ever to return to a scientifically based perception of these issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dieter Schrenk (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: