Key result
The overall rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was 5.6%, with no differences observed between patients treated with new anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and acenocoumarol.
Why the study?
Vitamin K antagonists are effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation but have a narrow therapeutic range and multiple interactions, prompting the evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding risk compared with newer anticoagulants.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) alter the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to acenocoumarol in anticoagulated patients?
Cohort (n=1,213)
Do direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) alter the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to acenocoumarol in anticoagulated patients?
In a retrospective cohort of anticoagulated patients, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was similar between acenocoumarol, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, with prior hemorrhage being a strong independent predictor.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Atrial fibrillation is a major cause of death and disability due to stroke. Vitamin K antagonist drugs are effective for prevention, but they have a narrow therapeutic range and multiple pharmacological interactions. In recent years, new therapeutic alternatives have been searched to minimize complications. The main objective is to evaluate the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients and compare the classic treatment with new anticoagulants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with acenocoumarol/dabigatran/rivaroxaban, between 2012 and 2016. We compared the classic with the new anticoagulant group, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determinate the risk factors of gastrointestinal bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 1213 patients were selected, 52.7% male patients, a mean age of 72.6 years old (± 14.563). 73.6% had atrial fibrilation. 14.5% of patients used acetylsalicylic acid, and 4% clopidogrel. 67.2% had a high-risk CHADS-2 Score, and 36.9% a high-risk HAS-BLED Score. We determined a 5.6% (68) of gastrointestinal bleeding, without differences according to anticoagulant used. The multivariate model showed a greater risk for digestive hemorrhage in patients with a previous hemorrhagic event (odds ratio [OR] = 2.422 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.101-5.327) and the concomitant therapy with clopidogrel (OR = 2.373 95% CI: 0.996-5.652). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding between the different anticoagulants. A previous gastrointestinal bleeding were considered independent risk factor. The HAS-BLED score should be taken into account to make clinical decisions about to prescribe anticoagulant treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agudo et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Anticoagulated patients (n=1,213). New anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban) vs. Classic anticoagulant (acenocoumarol) was evaluated on Gastrointestinal bleeding. The overall rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was 5.6%, with no differences observed between patients treated with new anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and acenocoumarol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: