Key result
Internal and external loop recorders improve early diagnosis rates for unexplained syncope, with similar diagnostic yields between devices, though without evidence of mortality benefit.
Why the study?
Do internal and external loop recorders improve the diagnosis rate in patients with unexplained syncope?
Do internal and external loop recorders improve the diagnosis rate in patients with unexplained syncope?
Both internal and external loop recorders are useful tools for diagnosing unexplained syncope, with ELR being a viable initial option for long-term monitoring before considering ILR.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports diagnostic use of loop recorders in unexplained syncope; leaves open effects on outcomes and need for RCTs.
The gold standard for diagnosing syncope is to elucidate the symptom-electrocardiogram (ECG) correlation. The ECG recordings during syncope allow physicians to either confirm or exclude an arrhythmia as the mechanism of syncope. Many studies have investigated the use of internal loop recorder (ILR), while few studies have used external loop recorder (ELR) for patients with unexplained syncope. The aim of this review is to clarify the clinical usefulness of ILR and ELR in the diagnosis and management of patients with unexplained syncope. Many observational and four randomized control studies have shown that ILR for patients with unknown syncope is a useful tool for early diagnosis and improving diagnosis rate. ILR also provides important information on the mechanism of syncope and treatment strategy. However, there is no evidence of total mortality or quality of life improvements with ILR. The diagnostic yield of ELR in patients with syncope was similar to that with ILR within the same timeframe. Therefore, ELR could be considered for long-term ECG monitoring before a patient switches to using ILR. A systematic approach and selection of ECG monitoring tools reduces health care costs and improves the selection of patients for optimal treatment possibilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaoru Tanno (2017) conducted a review in Unexplained syncope. Internal loop recorder (ILR) and external loop recorder (ELR) was evaluated. Internal and external loop recorders improve early diagnosis rates for unexplained syncope, with similar diagnostic yields between devices, though without evidence of mortality benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: