Key result
Insertion of a cardiac monitor for atrial fibrillation screening in high-risk patients was safe, with a 3.3% overall rate of procedure- or device-related serious adverse events.
Why the study?
Is an insertable cardiac monitor safe and acceptable for atrial fibrillation screening in high-risk patients without prior overt AF?
Cohort (n=395)
Open-label
Yes
Is an insertable cardiac monitor safe and acceptable for atrial fibrillation screening in high-risk patients without prior overt AF?
Insertable cardiac monitors for atrial fibrillation screening in high-risk patients are safe and well-accepted, with newer miniaturized devices demonstrating an improved safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ICM safety for AF screening in high-risk patients; leaves open need for randomized efficacy trials.
=2 plus one or more of the following: coronary artery disease, renal impairment, sleep apnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Exclusions included stroke or transient ischemic attack occurring in the previous year. Of 450 subjects screened, 399 underwent a device insertion attempt, and 395 were included in the final analysis (Reveal XT: n=122; Reveal LINQ: n=273; excluded: n=4). Participants were primarily identified by demographic characteristics and the presence of nonspecific symptoms, but without prior documentation of "overt" AF. The most common symptoms were palpitations (51%), dizziness/lightheadedness/pre-syncope (36%), and shortness of breath (36%). Over 100 subjects were enrolled in each pre-defined CHADS2 subgroup (2, 3 and ≥4). AF risk factors not included in the CHADS2 score were well represented (prevalence≥15%). Procedure and/or device related serious adverse events were low, with the miniaturized Reveal LINQ ICM having a more favorable safety profile than the predicate Reveal XT (all: n=13 [3.3%]; LINQ: n=6 [2.2%]; XT: n=7 [5.7%]). These data demonstrate that REVEAL AF was successful in enrolling its target population, high risk patients were willing to undergo ICM monitoring for AF screening, and ICM use in this group is becoming increasingly safe with advancements in technology. A clinically meaningful incidence of device detected AF in this study will inform clinical decisions regarding ICM use for AF screening in patients at risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conti et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation screening (n=395). Insertable cardiac monitor was evaluated on Procedure and/or device-related serious adverse events. Insertion of a cardiac monitor for atrial fibrillation screening in high-risk patients was safe, with a 3.3% overall rate of procedure- or device-related serious adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: