Key result
Acute stroke frequently induces cardiac injury and ECG changes via brain-heart axis disruption.
Why the study?
Stroke markedly affects the cardiovascular system, making it necessary to distinguish whether post-stroke cardiac abnormalities arise from coexisting ischemic heart disease or directly from brain injury to guide acute therapy.
A high prevalence of secondary myocardial injury and arrhythmias after acute stroke highlights the need for close neuro-cardiological collaboration and detailed cardiac monitoring.
May support integrated neuro-cardiac monitoring post-stroke; leaves open optimal protocols pending prospective trials.
The cardiovascular system is markedly affected by stress after stroke. There is a complex interaction between the brain and heart, and the understanding of the mutual effects has increased in recent decades. Stroke is accompanied by pathological disturbances leading to autonomic dysfunction and systemic inflammation, which leads to changes in cardiomyocyte metabolism. Cardiac injury after stroke may lead to serious complications and long-term cardiac problems. Evidence suggests that blood biomarkers and electrocardiogram analyses can be valuable for estimating the severity, prognosis, and therapy strategy in patients after stroke. It is necessary to distinguish whether these abnormalities presenting in stroke patients are caused by coexisting ischemic heart disease or are caused by brain injury directly. Distinguishing the origin can have a great impact on the treatment of patients after acute stroke. In this article, we focus on epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and the presentation of cardiac changes in patients after stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihalovič et al. (2021) conducted a review in Stroke. Acute stroke was evaluated. Acute stroke is frequently accompanied by cardiac injury and ECG abnormalities due to disruption of the brain-heart axis, necessitating detailed cardiac examination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: