Having ground truth is critical for evaluating segmentation algorithms and estimating the ground truth from a collection of manual segmentations remains a hard problem. A proper estimation approach should take into account and compensate for the inter-rater variation. In this paper, we conduct an analysis of manual segmentations in order to have a better understanding of the pattern of the variation and investigate whether incorporating such pattern information will improve the ground truth estimation. We propose a level-set based approach that solves the ground truth estimation in a probabilistic formulation. The prior pattern information is incorporated into the estimation model by adding a specially designed term in the energy function. Experiments on both synthetic and real data show that this prior information helps to find a more accurate estimate of the ground truth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: