Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present article reports on a case study into the influence and impact of action research carried out by teachers in a special school. The action research was an important component of the two‐year, post‐initial, in‐service course in special educational needs, provided by Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Department of Inclusive and Special Education. From the outset the case study was based on the premise that action research can be seen as a strategy for teacher leadership. Not only was it expected to help teachers to get to grips with their own work in the classroom, it was anticipated that their action research would also have an impact on the work of others in the school. We found that this was indeed the case, provided certain conditions were met. Notes 1. The group members gave workshops and presentations about their action research in and outside the school. This produced a large number of products, including video material, learning lines, observation and screening lists, organisational recommendations, policy plans and posters. Product and process results were put onto a national website of cooperating paedological institutes (Pi7) to make them available to the broader education world. http://www.wecraad.nl/index.php?pid=33. 2. The degree of influence and impact was rated on the thermometers on a scale from 0 to 10: 0–1 = no influence or impact; 2–3 = very little; 4–5 = little; 6–7 = average; 7–8 = great; 9–10 = very great. The same scale was used for the degree of appreciation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smeets et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: