Key result
Calibration of the Framingham score for the Taiwanese population yielded recommended coefficients of 0.7958 for males and 1 for females to predict the risk of coronary events.
Why the study?
What are the appropriate calibration coefficients for the Framingham risk score to predict coronary events in the Taiwanese population?
Cohort
What are the appropriate calibration coefficients for the Framingham risk score to predict coronary events in the Taiwanese population?
This study provides specific calibration coefficients (0.7958 for males, 1 for females) to improve the accuracy of the Framingham risk score for predicting coronary events in the Taiwanese population.
May support recalibrated Framingham use in Taiwanese adults; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: The Framingham score, which was developed in the United States, is often calibrated and used in various countries to predict 10-year risk of coronary events, based on the measurements of age, sex, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), smoking status, and systolic blood pressure. However, no calibration coefficient is currently available for Taiwan. Methods: Data from the Taiwanese Survey on Hypertension, Hyperglycemia, and Hyperlipidemia (TwSHHH) were used to calibrate the Framingham equation for Taiwanese usage and compared with coefficients of the Chinese Multi-provincial Cohort Study (CMCS). Coronary events were identified through the link to National Health Insurance claim data and the national death registry for 2011. The risk factors were total cholesterol (mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), cigarette smoking (yes/no), and diabetes (yes/no). The mean of these risk factors and the baseline survival probability were derived from TwSHHH. They were applied to the Framingham score function. Finally, the ratio of observed/ predicted was applied to calibrate the predicted probabilities. Results: When applying the Framingham function, agreement between the predicted and observed risk matched reasonably well in Taiwanese males, but not in females. The CMCS coefficients did not fit the Taiwanese population well. We recommend using 0.7958 and 1 as calibration coefficients for males and females, respectively. Conclusion: We generated Framingham calibration coefficient for the Taiwanese population. We recommend that the mean of predictors and the baseline survivorship derived from TwSHHH should be used in the model. Nonetheless, it is crucial to develop a risk function specific for this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease risk prediction. Framingham score calibration vs. Chinese Multi-provincial Cohort Study (CMCS) coefficients was evaluated on 10-year risk of coronary events. Calibration of the Framingham score for the Taiwanese population yielded recommended coefficients of 0.7958 for males and 1 for females to predict the risk of coronary events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: