Research on early identification of learning disabilities shows little consensus as to its feasibility. A review of programs geared to early intervention, after identification, indicates mainly inconclusive results or no follow-up and evaluation at all. The teacher as a key person in early identification and diagnosis is stressed. Teacher observations, together with continuous daily evaluation, seem to be the best course available under the circumstances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaer et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: