This paper reports on a formal user study on visual encodings of networks with multiple edge types in adjacency matrices. Our tasks and conditions were inspired by real problems in computational biology. We focus on encodings in adjacency matrices, selecting four designs from a potentially huge design space of visual encodings. We then settle on three visual variables to evaluate in a crowdsourcing study with 159 participants: orientation, position and colour. The best encodings were integrated into a visual analytics tool for inferring dynamic Bayesian networks and evaluated by computational biologists for additional evidence. We found that the encodings performed differently depending on the task, however, colour was found to help in all tasks except when trying to find the edge with the largest number of edge types. Orientation generally outperformed position in all of our tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogogias et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: