Retrospective analysis of HLA mismatched and matched allo-HSCT reveals comparable outcomes, suggesting viability of alternative donor options.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an important treatment option for hematologic diseases. However, limited studies have evaluated the prognosis of patients receiving single human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatched unrelated donor allo-HSCT (HLA 9/10 MMUD-HSCT) compared to those receiving fully matched unrelated donor allo-HSCT (10/10 MUD-HSCT). This study retrospectively analyzed 126 cases of unrelated donor allo-HSCT (URD-HSCT) at our center, in which anti-human thymocyte globulin (ATG, 7.5 mg/kg) was used as a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategy. The MUD-HSCT group had a significantly lower incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (13.89% vs. 35.19% in the MMUD-HSCT group, p = 0.005). In contrast, the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) did not differ significantly between the two groups (16.67% vs. 29.63%, p = 0.083). The median follow-up time was 16.98 months (range: 7.88-38.55). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (p = 0.707), 3-year CIR (p = 0.764), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.954), 3-year DFS (p = 0.888), 1-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.611), 3-year OS (p = 0.796), 3-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) (p = 0.711), or GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (p = 0.546). The estimated median OS and DFS times were not reached in either group. In conclusion, under an ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis regimen, HLA 9/10 MMUD-HSCT is a viable alternative donor option, offering comparable clinical outcomes to those of fully matched unrelated donor HSCT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: