Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review describes and discusses studies related to reduced-risk drinking as an additional treatment option for patients with problematic alcohol use and alcohol dependence. The review provides some empirical support for the following statements: (a) reduced-risk drinking is a viable option for at least some problem and dependent drinkers; (b) abstinence and non-abstinence-based treatments appear to be equally effective; (c) allowing patients to choose their treatment goal increases the success rate. The relatively short follow-up period (1-2 years) of the studies hampers a proper evaluation of the added value of the reduced-risk drinking approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amsterdam et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: