Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Mg(2+)-induced folding of RNA tertiary structures is readily observed via titrations of RNA with MgCl(2). Such titrations are commonly analyzed using a site binding formalism that includes a parameter, the Hill coefficient n, which is sometimes deemed the number of Mg(2+) ions bound by the native RNA at specific sites. However, the long-range nature of electrostatic interactions allows ions some distance from the RNA to stabilize an RNA structure. A complete description of all interactions taking place between Mg(2+) and an RNA uses a preferential interaction coefficient, Gamma(2+), which represents the "excess" Mg(2+) neutralizing the RNA charge. The difference between Gamma(2+) for the native and unfolded RNA forms (DeltaGamma(2+)) is the number of Mg(2+) ions "taken up" by an RNA upon folding. Here we determine the conditions under which the Hill coefficient n can be equated to the ion uptake DeltaGamma(2+) and find that two approximations are necessary: (i) the Mg(2+) activity coefficient is independent of concentration during a titration, and (ii) the dependence of DeltaGamma(2+) on Mg(2+) concentration is weak. Titration experiments with a Mg(2+)-binding dye and an adenine-binding riboswitch were designed to test these approximations. Inclusion of a 30-fold excess of KCl over MgCl(2) was sufficient to maintain a constant Mg(2+) activity coefficient. We also observed that Mg(2+) uptake by the RNA varied from near zero to approximately 2.6 as the Mg(2+) concentration increases over an approximately 100-fold range. It is possible to determine DeltaGamma(2+) from Mg(2+)-RNA titrations, but the values are only applicable to a limited range of solution conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leipply et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: